<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Open letter to EC : &#8220;We are using MySQL, help save it&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://anl4u.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=303" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://anl4u.com/?p=303</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 18:09:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Admin</title>
		<link>http://anl4u.com/?p=303&#038;cpage=1#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 10:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anl4u.com/?p=303#comment-25</guid>
		<description>Agree with you akoskm. Oracle will not kill MySQL by direct closing it, but make it close source and slow down the development and let it die. Yup, that&#039;s what maybe they planned. Becuase according to my knowledge most of the small enterprises are using MySQL instead of Oracle anymore. The growth rate is quite high for MySQL. And that&#039;s the reason creator of MySQL don&#039;t want it to let it die like that. He want to keep maintaining it. So i am with him. I hope, EC will take a decision which will not effect the development life cycle of MySQL. Other wise, there will be no more MySQL... 
I also read about java, you are correct, ATM they will not mess up with it and try to make money from it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree with you akoskm. Oracle will not kill MySQL by direct closing it, but make it close source and slow down the development and let it die. Yup, that&#8217;s what maybe they planned. Becuase according to my knowledge most of the small enterprises are using MySQL instead of Oracle anymore. The growth rate is quite high for MySQL. And that&#8217;s the reason creator of MySQL don&#8217;t want it to let it die like that. He want to keep maintaining it. So i am with him. I hope, EC will take a decision which will not effect the development life cycle of MySQL. Other wise, there will be no more MySQL&#8230;<br />
I also read about java, you are correct, ATM they will not mess up with it and try to make money from it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: akoskm</title>
		<link>http://anl4u.com/?p=303&#038;cpage=1#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>akoskm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 09:09:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anl4u.com/?p=303#comment-24</guid>
		<description>In my opinion, when Oracle finally bought Sun I was worrying more about Java than MySQL. ...but I can say now that Java is in safe, it provides a platform for those Oracle bases, it powers hardware and softwares to - so Oracle can benefit from it, but the case with MySQL is totally different... it makes loss to Oracle because it&#039;s the only database what can compete with it - and because it&#039;s free the consumers will chose that instead of Oracle - or at last that was the situation so far.
From side of Oracle the most simpler idea would be closing MySQL&#039;s source. It would definitely slow down the development, bugfixes etc... So they won&#039;t kill it just let it die.
If they want to keep consumers and MySQL &quot;alive&quot;, then they need to come up with a really good idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my opinion, when Oracle finally bought Sun I was worrying more about Java than MySQL. &#8230;but I can say now that Java is in safe, it provides a platform for those Oracle bases, it powers hardware and softwares to &#8211; so Oracle can benefit from it, but the case with MySQL is totally different&#8230; it makes loss to Oracle because it&#8217;s the only database what can compete with it &#8211; and because it&#8217;s free the consumers will chose that instead of Oracle &#8211; or at last that was the situation so far.<br />
From side of Oracle the most simpler idea would be closing MySQL&#8217;s source. It would definitely slow down the development, bugfixes etc&#8230; So they won&#8217;t kill it just let it die.<br />
If they want to keep consumers and MySQL &#8220;alive&#8221;, then they need to come up with a really good idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
